Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 14 |
| 2015-01-05 | -- |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | -- |
| 5.36 ounces | -- |
| Gray and Red | -- |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 185.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.99 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.2 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has an overall score of 90.7, which is much better than the LG G Flex 2's overall score of 75.2. Both devices in this comparison review include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S25 Ultra has 14 version and LG G Flex 2 has Android 5.0 version. The Galaxy S25 Ultra is a way thinner and a lot lighter phone than the LG G Flex 2.
LG G Flex 2 has a way better performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has less RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with a graphics processing unit and a 64-bits processing unit. The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much better looking display than LG G Flex 2, because it has a much better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels, a just a bit greater display pixel density and a larger display.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much better camera than LG G Flex 2, because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video definition and a lot higher 200 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than LG G Flex 2, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a superior battery lifetime than LG G Flex 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.