Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2015-01-05 | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Black |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 185.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | -- |
| 401 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 8.58 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has an overall score of 80.1, which is just a bit better than the LG G Flex 2's overall score of 75.2. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version while LG G Flex 2 has Android 5.0, providing the user a couple additional features. Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a a lot newer cellphone than LG G Flex 2, although it is much heavier and incredibly thicker.
The LG G Flex 2 counts with a bit better processing power than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM memory, and they both have 8 cores, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with a 64-bit processor and an extra graphics co-processor. The LG G Flex 2 has a slightly better looking display than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a way worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a much worse pixels density, it also counts with a quite larger display.
The LG G Flex 2 shoots slightly better videos and photos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a much better (4K) video resolution and a more MP back-facing camera. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG G Flex 2, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB and more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a way better battery lifetime than LG G Flex 2, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG G Flex 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG G Flex 2. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy the LG G Flex 2, letting go a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.