Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-01-05 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Black |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 185.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a little bit better than the LG G Flex 2, getting a global score of 81 against 75.2. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's construction is way newer, but a lot heavier and just a little thicker than the LG G Flex 2. Both devices in our current comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a newer 11 version and LG G Flex 2 has Android 5.0 version.
LG G Flex 2 counts with a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with a 64-bit processing unit and an additional graphics co-processor. LG G Flex 2 counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, although it has a quite smaller screen, a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a quite lower pixel number in each inch in the screen.
Galaxy XCover Pro features a much greater storage capacity for apps and games than LG G Flex 2, because it has more internal storage and a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy XCover Pro features a much better battery duration than LG G Flex 2, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a superior camera than LG G Flex 2, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a camera in the back with a way higher 25 mega pixels resolution.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG G Flex 2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG G Flex 2. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, else you can save a couple dollars and get the LG G Flex 2, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.