Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2015-01-05 | 2020-02-14 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 185.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is better than LG G Flex 2, getting an 88.5 score against 75.2. Galaxy Z Flip's body is way newer and way thinner than LG G Flex 2's, but it's heavier. These devices have Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Flip has newer 12 version while LG G Flex 2 has Android 5.0. LG G Flex 2 counts with just a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a bit less pixels per screen inch, a bit smaller display and a bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution.
The LG G Flex 2 features a little faster CPU than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with a 64-bits CPU and an extra graphics processor. Galaxy Z Flip captures better pictures and videos than LG G Flex 2, although it has a lower (4K) video quality and a lesser MP resolution camera.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a very superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than LG G Flex 2, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Galaxy Z Flip features a bit longer battery duration than LG G Flex 2, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG G Flex 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG G Flex 2. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy the LG G Flex 2, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.