Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-01-05 | 2020-08-07 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 185.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.2 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is way better than LG G Flex 2, with a 92.3 score against 75.2. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has 11 version while LG G Flex 2 has Android 5.0, so it provides the user a couple nice extra features. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a much newer and notably thinner phone than LG G Flex 2, but it's somewhat heavier.
LG G Flex 2 features a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have 8 processing cores, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with a GPU and a 64 bits CPU. LG G Flex 2 counts with a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a little less pixels per screen inch, a little bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a bit smaller screen.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G captures much better pictures and videos than LG G Flex 2, although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a back-facing camera with lesser mega-pixels resolution. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG G Flex 2, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit superior battery life than LG G Flex 2, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is way more expensive than LG G Flex 2, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.