Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-01-05 | 2020-09-18 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 185.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.2 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way better than the LG G Flex 2, having a overall score of 94.6 against 75.2. Both phones in this comparison review include Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a newer 11 version while LG G Flex 2 has Android 5.0 version. Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a noticeably newer and extremely thinner phone than the LG G Flex 2, but it's heavier.
The LG G Flex 2 has a brighter screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a much lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little better pixels quantity per inch of display. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a much greater memory to store more games and applications than LG G Flex 2, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
The LG G Flex 2 features a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has 9 GB less RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with a 64-bits processing unit and a GPU. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a greater camera than LG G Flex 2, although it has a lower video definition and a less mega-pixels resolution camera.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a much better battery lifetime than LG G Flex 2, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG G Flex 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG G Flex 2. If you want to save some dollars, you can get LG G Flex 2, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.