Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.0 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-01-05 | 2019-08-20 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 185.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a general score of 82.7, which is much better than LG G Flex 2's 75.2 general score. Both devices in our current comparison come with Android OS, but the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a more recent 10 version and LG G Flex 2 has Android 5.0 version, so it gives some nice extra features and improved performance. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro's design is newer and a bit thinner, but also incredibly heavier than the LG G Flex 2.
The LG G Flex 2 has just a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with a 64-bits processing unit and an additional graphics processor. LG G Flex 2 features a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, although it has a bit smaller display, a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a little bit lower count of pixels per inch in the display.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a very superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than LG G Flex 2, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has superior battery performance than LG G Flex 2, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a greater camera than LG G Flex 2, and although they both have the same video quality, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has faster video frame rates and a lot more MP back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.