Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-01-05 | 2018-04-03 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 185.00 | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a global score of 83.8, which is much better than the LG G Flex 2's score of 75.2. Although the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is somewhat heavier than LG G Flex 2, it's somewhat thinner and also incredibly newer. The LG G Flex 2 has a sharper display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, although it has a bit worse 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution, a little less pixels per inch of screen and a bit smaller screen.
The LG G Flex 2 counts with a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has less RAM, and they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with a 64 bits CPU and a GPU. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has much more storage to store more apps and games than LG G Flex 2, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a bit better battery life than LG G Flex 2, because it has a 13 percent bigger battery capacity. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a superior camera than LG G Flex 2, although it has a lower 12 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera and a worse 3840x2160 video definition.
Although Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG G Flex 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG G Flex 2. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, else you can save some dollars and get the LG G Flex 2, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.