Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.0 | Android 10 |
| 2015-01-05 | 2020-09-08 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 185.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is just a bit better than LG G Flex 2, having a global score of 81.6 against 75.2. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is a a lot heavier phone than the LG G Flex 2, but both of them have the same thickness. These phones work with Android OS, but the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has the newer 10 version and LG G Flex 2 has Android 5.0.
LG G Flex 2 features a bit better processing unit than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has lesser RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with a 64 bits processor and an additional GPU. LG G Flex 2 has a slightly better screen than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a little bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, it also counts with a little higher pixels count per display inch.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC captures much better pictures and videos than LG G Flex 2, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has a much better resolution back facing camera. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a much bigger memory for games and applications than LG G Flex 2, because it has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB and 32 GB more internal storage.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a really longer battery life than LG G Flex 2, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.