Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.0 | Android 10 |
| 2015-01-05 | 2020-05-20 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 185.00 | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 is a bit better than the LG G Flex 2, having a 76.6 score against 75.2. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 construction is newer and a bit thinner, but also a lot heavier than LG G Flex 2. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a newer 10 version and LG G Flex 2 has Android 5.0, so it gives a lot of extra features.
LG G Flex 2 has a brighter screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a little bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit more pixels per display inch. The LG G Flex 2 features a little faster processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have a 3 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core CPU, the LG G Flex 2 also has a graphics processor and a 64-bits CPU.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG G Flex 2, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 128 GB, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has more internal storage. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 captures greater pictures and videos than LG G Flex 2, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has a much more megapixels back facing camera.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features a superior battery duration than LG G Flex 2, because it has a 67 percent larger battery size.
Although Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG G Flex 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG G Flex 2. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the LG G Flex 2, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.