Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-01-05 | 2020-04-07 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 185.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has an overall score of 79, which is a bit better than LG G Flex 2's 75.2 global score. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S construction is a lot newer and a little thinner, but also way heavier than LG G Flex 2. These devices come with Android operating system, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a more recent 11 version while LG G Flex 2 has Android 5.0.
LG G Flex 2 features a bit superior CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has lesser RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with an additional graphics co-processor and a 64-bits CPU. LG G Flex 2 has a sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a quite smaller display and a bit lower 1920 x 1080px resolution, it also counts with a bit better pixel density.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S captures much clearer photographs and videos than LG G Flex 2, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a way more MP back-facing camera. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than LG G Flex 2, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB and 32 GB more internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a very superior battery performance than LG G Flex 2, because it has a 5020mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S costs more money than LG G Flex 2, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.