Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 70.8 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | HTC |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 5.0 |
| 2019-11-05 | 2015-03-01 |
| 9.73 x 5.93 x 0.31 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 17.57 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Silver | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 240.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 5 inches |
| 1920 x 1200 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 224 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.48 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 9.12 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
HTC One M9 is just a bit better than the LG G Pad 5, getting a overall score of 77.7 against 70.8. Both phones we compare here come with Android operating system, but the HTC One M9 has the previous 5.0 version while LG G Pad 5 has Android 9.0 Pie. The HTC One M9 body is way lighter than the LG G Pad 5, although it is thicker and was released many years before.
The HTC One M9 features a little bit better performance than LG G Pad 5, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM, and they both have 8 cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with an extra GPU and a 64-bit CPU. HTC One M9 features a much more vibrant screen than LG G Pad 5, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a lot more pixels per display inch.
The HTC One M9 counts with a very superior camera than LG G Pad 5, because it has a way higher 3840x2160 video definition and a much higher 20 megapixels resolution camera. The LG G Pad 5 counts with a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 32 GB internal storage, the LG G Pad 5 also has a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB.
LG G Pad 5 counts with a superior battery duration than HTC One M9, because it has 8200mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the HTC One M9 is also a bargain compared to others, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.