Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
3G OnlySM-N9000
| Global Score | |
| 70.8 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2019-11-05 | 2013-09-04 |
| 9.73 x 5.93 x 0.31 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 17.57 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Silver | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 240.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1200 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 224 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz + Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP6 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.48 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.1 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 490 hours standby time 20 hours talk time |
| 9.12 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 has a score of 80.7, which is much better than LG G Pad 5's 70.8 global score. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Galaxy Note 3 has 5.0 version and LG G Pad 5 has Android 9.0 Pie. Even though the Galaxy Note 3 is extremely older and a little thicker than LG G Pad 5, it's body is still noticeably lighter.
The Galaxy Note 3 counts with a much better display than LG G Pad 5, because although it has a really smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, it also counts with a way better number of pixels per inch of display. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a bit better performance than LG G Pad 5, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 also counts with an additional graphics co-processor.
The Galaxy Note 3 shoots a lot better pictures and videos than LG G Pad 5, because it has a lot better resolution back facing camera and a lot higher video resolution. The LG G Pad 5 has just a bit more memory for apps and games than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 512 GB.
LG G Pad 5 features a way better battery performance than Galaxy Note 3, because it has 8200mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Galaxy Note 3 costs a bit more than the LG G Pad 5, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.