Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | -- |
| 2014-02-12 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.56 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 has an overall score of 80, which is slightly better than the LG G Pro 2's global score of 74.8. The Google Pixel 3 body is noticeably newer, just a little thinner and somewhat lighter than the LG G Pro 2. The LG G Pro 2 features a bit sharper screen than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a just a bit less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a quite bigger screen.
Google Pixel 3 has a bit bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than LG G Pro 2, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage capacity. The Google Pixel 3 has a bit superior CPU than LG G Pro 2, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with 1 GB more RAM memory and more processing cores.
The Google Pixel 3 counts with a little bit better camera than LG G Pro 2, because although it has a back camera with a lower 12.2 mega-pixels resolution and a lower video quality, it also counts with a bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much larger aperture. LG G Pro 2 features a bit superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 10% larger battery capacity.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Google Pixel 3 is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.