Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | -- |
| 2014-02-12 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.56 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL is slightly better than LG G Pro 2, with a global score of 80.7 against 74.8. Although the Google Pixel 3 XL is just a little heavier than the LG G Pro 2, it's just a little thinner and much newer. LG G Pro 2 features a little bit better display than Google Pixel 3 XL, although it has a lot worse 1920 x 1080px resolution, a quite smaller display and a much lower display density.
Google Pixel 3 XL has a bit more memory for games and applications than LG G Pro 2, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory capacity. The Google Pixel 3 XL has a bit more powerful processor than LG G Pro 2, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM and a larger number of faster cores.
The Google Pixel 3 XL captures slightly better photographs and videos than LG G Pro 2, because although it has a back-facing camera with a lower resolution and a lower 3840x2160 video resolution, it also counts with a much larger diafragm aperture for better captures in low-light environments and a bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting higher quality pictures.
Google Pixel 3 XL has just a bit longer battery lifetime than LG G Pro 2, because it has a 3430mAh battery size.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Google Pixel 3 XL is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.