Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2014-02-12 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.56 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a has an overall score of 78.8, which is slightly better than the LG G Pro 2's general score of 74.8. Google Pixel 3a is a a lot newer cellphone, and it is also lighter and just a bit thinner than LG G Pro 2. Both phones in this review use Android operating system, but the Google Pixel 3a has 11 version while LG G Pro 2 has Android 5.0.
The LG G Pro 2 counts with just a bit better looking display than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a bit inferior amount of pixels per inch of screen and a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px, it also counts with a bit bigger screen. Google Pixel 3a counts with a slightly bigger storage for games and applications than LG G Pro 2, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The LG G Pro 2 counts with a little bit better processing power than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has an inferior number of cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor. Google Pixel 3a takes a little bit better photos and videos than LG G Pro 2, because although it has a lower (4K) video definition and a camera in the back with lesser mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a much bigger camera aperture to capture better captures in poorly lited situations and a bigger sensor.
LG G Pro 2 counts with a little better battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 3200mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Google Pixel 3a not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.