Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2014-02-12 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.56 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a XL has a score of 78.9, which is just a bit better than the LG G Pro 2's 74.8 score. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Google Pixel 3a XL has a newer 11 version while LG G Pro 2 has Android 5.0 version, so it provides the user a couple additional features and some performance improvements. The Google Pixel 3a XL construction is way newer, just a little lighter and just a little thinner than LG G Pro 2.
The LG G Pro 2 counts with a little bit better processing power than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and lesser cpu cores , it also counts with a graphics processor. The LG G Pro 2 features a bit sharper screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, although it has a bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, a bit lower screen density and a little smaller screen.
Google Pixel 3a XL has a little bit more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than LG G Pro 2, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage. Google Pixel 3a XL has just a bit better battery lifetime than LG G Pro 2, because it has a 3700mAh battery capacity against 3200mAh.
The Google Pixel 3a XL takes a bit better videos and photos than LG G Pro 2, because although it has a camera with lesser megapixels and a lower video resolution, it also counts with a bigger sensor providing a higher image quality and a lot bigger aperture to capture better low-light images and videos.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Google Pixel 3a XL is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.