Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | -- |
| 2014-02-12 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.56 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL is better than the LG G Pro 2, with a global score of 82.9 against 74.8. The Google Pixel 4 XL construction is extremely newer and a little bit thinner, but also somewhat heavier than LG G Pro 2. Google Pixel 4 XL has a screen that's very similar to the display in LG G Pro 2, although the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a greater amount of pixels per inch of screen, a lot higher 1440 x 3040 pixels resolution and a quite bigger screen.
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a bit more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than LG G Pro 2, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Google Pixel 4 XL features a bit faster processing unit than LG G Pro 2, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with more RAM and more processing cores.
Google Pixel 4 XL features a bit better battery lifetime than LG G Pro 2, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity. The Google Pixel 4 XL takes slightly better photographs and videos than LG G Pro 2, because although it has a back camera with lesser MP and a worse (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor and a lot larger camera aperture.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG G Pro 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG G Pro 2. If you want to save some dollars, you can get LG G Pro 2, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.