Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-02-12 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Just black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a has a global score of 82.9, which is much better than the LG G Pro 2's 74.8 overall score. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the Google Pixel 4a has a newer 11 version while LG G Pro 2 has Android 5.0 version. The Google Pixel 4a design is notably newer, a bit thinner and somewhat lighter than LG G Pro 2.
Google Pixel 4a's processing unit is just as good as the LG G Pro 2 one, because although the Google Pixel 4a has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with a greater number of cores (but slower) and a higher amount of RAM memory. LG G Pro 2 has a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a little bit inferior count of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a little larger screen.
The Google Pixel 4a captures just a bit better photographs and videos than LG G Pro 2, because although it has a lesser mega pixels camera in the back and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a way bigger aperture for better low light photography and a bigger camera sensor taking higher quality photos and videos.
The Google Pixel 4a counts with a superior memory capacity for games and applications than LG G Pro 2, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The LG G Pro 2 has a bit longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 2 percent more battery size.
Google Pixel 4a costs a lot more than LG G Pro 2, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.