Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android 11 |
| 2014-02-12 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Clearly white and Just black |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is better than the LG G Pro 2, with an 87.5 score against 74.8. Google Pixel 4a 5G is a a lot newer cellphone, and it is also a little thinner and a little lighter than LG G Pro 2. These phones include Android OS, but Google Pixel 4a 5G has a more recent 11 version while LG G Pro 2 has Android 5.0 version, giving you lots of additional features.
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a bit superior processing unit than LG G Pro 2, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory and 4 more cores. The LG G Pro 2 has a bit better display than Google Pixel 4a 5G, although it has a little bit smaller display, a little bit worse pixel amount per inch of screen and a bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G takes clearer videos and photos than LG G Pro 2, because although it has a camera with lesser megapixels and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, it also counts with a lot bigger aperture to take better photos in low light environments and a bigger camera sensor which offers a higher photo and video quality.
Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than LG G Pro 2, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with superior battery duration than LG G Pro 2, because it has 3885mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Google Pixel 4a 5G is a lot more expensive than the LG G Pro 2, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.