Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | HTC |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | -- |
| 2014-02-12 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 373 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
HTC U Ultra is a bit better than LG G Pro 2, getting a 77 score against 74.8. The HTC U Ultra is a way newer cellphone, and it is also a little lighter and just a little bit thinner than the LG G Pro 2. The LG G Pro 2 has a little more vivid display than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a much lower pixel density and a way lower resolution of 1920 x 1080, it also counts with a bit bigger screen.
The LG G Pro 2 features a bit better hardware performance than HTC U Ultra, because although it has lesser RAM memory, and they both have 4 processing cores, the LG G Pro 2 also counts with an extra graphics co-processor. The HTC U Ultra counts with a bit better camera than LG G Pro 2, because although it has a less mega pixels camera in the back and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a way larger aperture for better images in low light environments and a lot larger camera sensor which gives a lot better photo and video quality.
HTC U Ultra has a much bigger memory to store more apps and games than LG G Pro 2, because it has 32 GB more internal storage and an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. LG G Pro 2 has just a bit longer battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 7 percent more battery size.
Although HTC U Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG G Pro 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG G Pro 2. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy HTC U Ultra, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the LG G Pro 2, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.