Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2014-02-12 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8X ThinQ has a global score of 82.7, which is much better than the LG G Pro 2's 74.8 overall score. LG G8X ThinQ's construction has the same thickness than the LG G Pro 2, but it's somewhat heavier. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but LG G8X ThinQ has the newer 10 version while LG G Pro 2 has Android 5.0 version, offering lots of additional features.
LG G Pro 2 has a little more vivid screen than LG G8X ThinQ, although it has a bit smaller screen, a bit lower 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution and a bit less pixels per inch in the screen. The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than LG G Pro 2, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
LG G8X ThinQ has just a bit better performance than LG G Pro 2, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with 3 GB more RAM memory and a higher number of cores (and faster). LG G8X ThinQ counts with a little bit better camera than LG G Pro 2, because although it has a lesser MP resolution camera and a lower 3840x2160 video definition, it also counts with a way bigger camera aperture and a bigger sensor providing a higher image quality.
The LG G8X ThinQ counts with greater battery life than LG G Pro 2, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3200mAh.
LG G8X ThinQ not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper than the LG G Pro 2.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.