Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android 10 |
| 2014-02-12 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Titan gray |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 373 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K92 is better than LG G Pro 2, having an 85.4 score against 74.8. Both devices we are comparing include Android OS, but the LG K92 has the newer 10 version while LG G Pro 2 has Android 5.0, so it counts with a couple additional features. The LG K92 is a somewhat heavier phone than LG G Pro 2, but both are equally thin.
The LG G Pro 2 has a slightly better looking display than LG K92, although it has a little bit lower quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, a little worse 1920 x 1080 resolution and a little bit smaller screen. The LG G Pro 2 has a little faster processing unit than LG K92, because although it has 3 GB less RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with an additional GPU.
The LG K92 counts with a much better camera than LG G Pro 2, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the LG K92 also has a lot more megapixels back facing camera, a lot bigger sensor which gives a much better image and video quality and a lot bigger aperture for better low light images.
LG K92 counts with a very superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than LG G Pro 2, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB and more internal storage. The LG K92 counts with greater battery duration than LG G Pro 2, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
LG K92 costs a lot more than the LG G Pro 2, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.