Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android 10 |
| 2014-02-12 | 2020-05-07 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Mirror black |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 373 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG Q70 is slightly better than LG G Pro 2, with a global score of 77.9 against 74.8. The LG Q70 body is much newer and just a bit thinner than the LG G Pro 2's, although it is heavier. Both devices we are comparing here use Android operating system, but the LG Q70 has the newer 10 version and LG G Pro 2 has Android 5.0, so it gives lots of additional features and performance optimizations.
The LG G Pro 2 counts with a little better performance than LG Q70, because although it has less cpu cores (but faster) and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit. LG G Pro 2 counts with a little bit better looking display than LG Q70, although it has a little bit smaller screen, a bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a little worse screen pixel density.
LG Q70 shoots much clearer pictures and videos than LG G Pro 2, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the LG Q70 also has a camera in the back with much more MP, a bigger back camera sensor taking better quality videos and pictures and a lot larger diafragm aperture.
The LG Q70 features a superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than LG G Pro 2, because it has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal storage. The LG Q70 features longer battery performance than LG G Pro 2, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although LG Q70 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG G Pro 2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG G Pro 2. If you want to save some dollars, you can get LG G Pro 2, and give up a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.