Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2014-02-12 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ is better than LG G Pro 2, having a global score of 82.5 against 74.8. The LG V30S ThinQ body is newer, a little lighter and thinner than the LG G Pro 2. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the LG V30S ThinQ has a newer 8.0 Oreo version and LG G Pro 2 has Android 5.0, so it offers a lot of extra features and performance optimizations.
LG G Pro 2 features a slightly better looking screen than LG V30S ThinQ, although it has much less pixels per inch in the screen, a way lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a little bit smaller display. The LG V30S ThinQ has a much bigger storage to install applications and games than LG G Pro 2, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 96 GB more internal memory.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a bit better processing unit than LG G Pro 2, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores. LG V30S ThinQ shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than LG G Pro 2, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor taking lower quality images, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the LG V30S ThinQ also counts with a much bigger aperture and a back facing camera with more mega pixels.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a little better battery performance than LG G Pro 2, because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG G Pro 2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG G Pro 2. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy LG V30S ThinQ, otherwise you can save some money and get the LG G Pro 2, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.