Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-02-12 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 9.46 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ has an overall score of 87.6, which is much better than LG G Pro 2's overall score of 74.8. LG V60 ThinQ is a incredibly newer cellphone than the LG G Pro 2, although it's a little bit thicker and noticeably heavier. These devices include Android operating system, but the LG V60 ThinQ has the newer 11 version while LG G Pro 2 has Android 5.0 version.
LG V60 ThinQ features a bit better processing unit than LG G Pro 2, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with a larger number of faster cores and 5 GB more RAM. LG G Pro 2 has a little sharper display than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a little lower 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution, a little smaller screen and a just a little worse screen density.
LG V60 ThinQ shoots a bit better photos and videos than LG G Pro 2, because it has a lot better 7680x4320 video definition, a much bigger camera aperture to capture better images in low light environments, a way higher 64 megapixels resolution back camera and a way larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The LG V60 ThinQ features a much better storage capacity to store more games and applications than LG G Pro 2, because it has an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB and 96 GB more internal memory. The LG V60 ThinQ has a way better battery performance than LG G Pro 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
LG V60 ThinQ is more expensive than LG G Pro 2, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.