Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android 10 |
| 2014-02-12 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Wing is way better than the LG G Pro 2, getting a 91.2 score against 74.8. Both of these devices have Android OS, but the LG Wing has the newer 10 version while LG G Pro 2 has Android 5.0 version, offering a couple nice extra features and performance optimizations. The LG Wing is a notably newer cellphone than LG G Pro 2, but it is a lot heavier and noticeably thicker.
The LG Wing counts with a bit more powerful processor than LG G Pro 2, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with a larger number of cores and a greater amount of RAM memory. The LG G Pro 2 features a little more vivid display than LG Wing, although it has a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px, a quite smaller screen and a just a little worse pixel quantity per display inch.
The LG Wing captures greater photos and videos than LG G Pro 2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the LG Wing also has better video frame rates, a lot larger diafragm aperture, a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing much better quality photographs and a camera with lot more MP.
LG Wing counts with a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than LG G Pro 2, because it has 256 GB internal memory and a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG Wing has longer battery lifetime than LG G Pro 2, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG G Pro 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG G Pro 2. So if you want that extra features, you can buy LG Wing, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the LG G Pro 2, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.