Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Microsoft |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android 11 |
| 2014-02-12 | 2021-09-20 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Glacier and Obsidian |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 8.3 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2688 x 1892 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4449mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is much better than LG G Pro 2, having an 85.3 score against 74.8. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has newer 11 version and LG G Pro 2 has Android 5.0, offering a couple additional features and performance optimizations. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 body is incredibly newer and thinner, but also noticeably heavier than LG G Pro 2.
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with a bit better performance than LG G Pro 2, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with more RAM and a larger number of cores. Microsoft Surface Duo 2 features a screen that's just as good as LG G Pro 2's display, although the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 also has a lot higher 1892 x 2688 pixels resolution, a really bigger screen and a bit more pixels per display inch.
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 takes a little bit better photographs and videos than LG G Pro 2, because although it has a camera with a lower resolution and a lower 3840x2160 video resolution, it also counts with a much bigger diafragm aperture to capture better images and video in low-light situations.
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with a very superior memory capacity for apps and games than LG G Pro 2, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 features a really longer battery performance than LG G Pro 2, because it has 4449mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 costs a lot more money than the LG G Pro 2, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.