Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-02-12 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Smoke black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 373 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G Power has an overall score of 76.1, which is a little bit better than LG G Pro 2's 74.8 overall score. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the Moto G Power has a more recent 11 version and LG G Pro 2 has Android 5.0 version. Even though the Moto G Power is noticeably newer than the LG G Pro 2, it is somewhat heavier and thicker.
LG G Pro 2 features just a bit better looking screen than Moto G Power, although it has a little smaller display, a quite inferior pixels number per screen inch and a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080. The Motorola Moto G Power has a much bigger storage capacity for applications and games than LG G Pro 2, because it has more internal storage and a SD memory slot that admits up to 512 GB.
The LG G Pro 2 has just a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a lower number of cores (although faster) and 1 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a graphics processing unit. The Motorola Moto G Power takes slightly better photos and videos than LG G Pro 2, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Motorola Moto G Power also has a way larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photos, a bigger sensor taking better quality videos and photos and a back-facing camera with a higher resolution.
The Motorola Moto G Power features a much longer battery life than LG G Pro 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Moto G Power is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.