Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2014-02-12 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto Z Force is just a bit better than LG G Pro 2, getting a 75.8 score against 74.8. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Moto Z Force has newer 7.0 Nougat version and LG G Pro 2 has Android 5.0, so it gives a couple additional features. The Moto Z Force is a incredibly newer phone, and it is also a little lighter and somewhat thinner than LG G Pro 2.
The LG G Pro 2 has a bit better display than Moto Z Force, because although it has a much worse quantity of pixels in each inch of screen and a lot worse 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little bit larger display. LG G Pro 2 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have 4 cores, the LG G Pro 2 also counts with an extra graphics co-processor.
Motorola Moto Z Force features a way bigger storage for apps and games than LG G Pro 2, because it has more internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Moto Z Force counts with a little bit better camera than LG G Pro 2, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Moto Z Force also has a back facing camera with way more MP and a lot larger aperture.
Moto Z Force has just a little better battery duration than LG G Pro 2, because it has a 9 percent bigger battery capacity.
The Moto Z Force costs a little more money than LG G Pro 2, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.