Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | -- |
| 2014-02-12 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Oxford blue |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | $ 398.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LCD |
| 373 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One 5G has a global score of 84.6, which is better than LG G Pro 2's overall score of 74.8. The Motorola One 5G design is newer than the LG G Pro 2's, but it's just a bit thicker and heavier. Motorola One 5G's processor is just as good as LG G Pro 2's CPU, because although the Motorola One 5G has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with a larger number of faster cores and a higher amount of RAM.
The LG G Pro 2 counts with a little bit better screen than Motorola One 5G, although it has a little less pixels per inch in the display, a little smaller display and a quite lower 1920 x 1080 resolution. The Motorola One 5G takes way better videos and photos than LG G Pro 2, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola One 5G also has a lot bigger diafragm aperture, a camera in the back with a much better resolution and a lot bigger sensor which offers a way higher photo and video quality.
The Motorola One 5G counts with a superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than LG G Pro 2, because it has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and 96 GB more internal memory. Motorola One 5G counts with a much longer battery duration than LG G Pro 2, because it has a 56% more battery size.
The Motorola One 5G costs a lot more than the LG G Pro 2, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.