Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | -- |
| 2014-02-12 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LTPS |
| 373 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One 5G Ace has a score of 81.6, which is a bit better than the LG G Pro 2's 74.8 overall score. Motorola One 5G Ace's design is incredibly newer, but somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker than the LG G Pro 2. The LG G Pro 2 counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola One 5G Ace, although it has a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, a little bit smaller display and a just a little inferior count of pixels per inch in the screen.
Motorola One 5G Ace has a very superior storage for games and applications than LG G Pro 2, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB and more internal storage. The LG G Pro 2 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has less cpu cores (but faster) and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an extra graphics processor.
Motorola One 5G Ace takes much better photographs and videos than LG G Pro 2, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has a much larger camera aperture for better low-light captures and video and a camera in the back with much more mega pixels.
The Motorola One 5G Ace counts with a way better battery performance than LG G Pro 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The Motorola One 5G Ace costs a lot more than LG G Pro 2, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.