Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-02-12 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 373 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper has a general score of 79.8, which is just a bit better than LG G Pro 2's 74.8 score. The Motorola One Hyper body is noticeably newer, but heavier and a bit thicker than LG G Pro 2. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android operating system, but the Motorola One Hyper has newer 11 version and LG G Pro 2 has Android 5.0.
LG G Pro 2 has a slightly better screen than Motorola One Hyper, although it has a quite worse display pixel density, a little smaller display and a little bit worse 1920 x 1080px resolution. Motorola One Hyper counts with a superior storage to store more games and applications than LG G Pro 2, because it has 96 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB.
LG G Pro 2 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has 4 less processing cores (but faster) and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit. The Motorola One Hyper counts with a much better camera than LG G Pro 2, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola One Hyper also has a lot bigger aperture for better low-light captures and videos and a camera with much more megapixels.
Motorola One Hyper has greater battery performance than LG G Pro 2, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Motorola One Hyper is way more expensive than LG G Pro 2, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.