Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | -- |
| 2014-02-12 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Blue and Brown |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 373 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Vision has a general score of 80.7, which is a little bit better than LG G Pro 2's 74.8 overall score. Motorola One Vision is a incredibly newer phone than the LG G Pro 2, but it's a little bit heavier and a little thicker. LG G Pro 2 counts with a little faster processor than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores (although faster), it also counts with an extra graphics processor.
The LG G Pro 2 features a little bit better looking screen than Motorola One Vision, although it has a little smaller screen, a little worse 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution and a bit lower pixel density. The Motorola One Vision has a superior storage for games and applications than LG G Pro 2, because it has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 96 GB more internal storage.
The Motorola One Vision features a way better camera than LG G Pro 2, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the Motorola One Vision also has a much larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a much higher photo and video quality, a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels and a way larger diafragm aperture to capture better captures and videos in poorly lited situations.
Motorola One Vision counts with a bit superior battery performance than LG G Pro 2, because it has a 9% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.