Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | -- |
| 2014-02-12 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Zoom is a little bit better than the LG G Pro 2, with a score of 80 against 74.8. Even though the Motorola One Zoom is notably newer than LG G Pro 2, it's just a bit thicker and a bit heavier. LG G Pro 2 counts with a little faster CPU than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a graphics co-processor.
LG G Pro 2 features just a bit better looking display than Motorola One Zoom, although it has a just a little lower pixels quantity in each inch of display, a little smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px. Motorola One Zoom shoots much clearer photographs and videos than LG G Pro 2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola One Zoom also has a lot bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels and a lot larger diafragm aperture for better photos and videos in poorly lited situations.
The Motorola One Zoom features a much better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG G Pro 2, because it has an external memory card slot that allows up to 128 GB and 128 GB internal memory. The Motorola One Zoom features better battery life than LG G Pro 2, because it has a 25% greater battery size.
Although Motorola One Zoom is a better device, it is way more expensive than LG G Pro 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG G Pro 2. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Motorola One Zoom, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the LG G Pro 2, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.