Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android 15 |
| 2014-02-12 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | -- |
| IPS LCD | LTPO |
| 373 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.56 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a global score of 79.2, which is a bit better than LG G Pro 2's 74.8 overall score. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has newer 15 version while LG G Pro 2 has Android 5.0 version. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) construction is incredibly newer and a lot thinner, but heavier than LG G Pro 2.
LG G Pro 2 counts with an incredibly better screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a quite smaller screen. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than LG G Pro 2, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The LG G Pro 2 features a very superior processor than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because although it has less CPU cores (although faster) and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a superior battery duration than LG G Pro 2, because it has a 47% greater battery size.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a lot better camera than LG G Pro 2, because it has a much bigger camera aperture, a much higher 7680x4320 video definition and a back camera with a way higher 50 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.