Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Nokia |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | -- |
| 2014-02-12 | 2019-03-03 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Nokia 9 PureView is a little bit better than the LG G Pro 2, with a global score of 76.4 against 74.8. The Nokia 9 PureView is a just a little thinner cellphone than LG G Pro 2, but both weight 6.07oz. Nokia 9 PureView features a bit faster processing unit than LG G Pro 2, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with more RAM and a higher number of faster cores.
Nokia 9 PureView counts with a display that's very similar to LG G Pro 2's screen, although the Nokia 9 PureView also has more pixels per inch of screen, a quite bigger display and a way better 1440 x 2880px resolution. Nokia 9 PureView captures just a bit better photos and videos than LG G Pro 2, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 video quality and a camera with less mega pixels, it also counts with a much bigger aperture and a bigger back-facing camera sensor.
The Nokia 9 PureView has a very superior storage for apps and games than LG G Pro 2, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Nokia 9 PureView has a bit longer battery duration than LG G Pro 2, because it has 3320mAh of battery capacity.
Although Nokia 9 PureView is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG G Pro 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG G Pro 2. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get LG G Pro 2, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.