Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Nokia |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android 11 |
| 2014-02-12 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 373 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nokia XR20 is just a bit better than the LG G Pro 2, having a general score of 80.8 against 74.8. These phones use Android operating system, but the Nokia XR20 has a more recent 11 version while LG G Pro 2 has Android 5.0. Although Nokia XR20 is notably newer than the LG G Pro 2, it's noticeably thicker and heavier.
The LG G Pro 2 has just a bit better processing power than Nokia XR20, because although it has lesser RAM and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor. LG G Pro 2 features a bit more vivid screen than Nokia XR20, although it has a bit less pixels per inch of screen, a little bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution and a little smaller screen.
Nokia XR20 counts with a much better memory for games and applications than LG G Pro 2, because it has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. Nokia XR20 captures much clearer videos and photos than LG G Pro 2, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video quality, the Nokia XR20 also has a much more mega pixels camera, a way bigger diafragm aperture, faster video frame rate and a way bigger sensor which offers a much better image and video quality.
Nokia XR20 features a way better battery life than LG G Pro 2, because it has a 45 percent larger battery size.
Although Nokia XR20 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG G Pro 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG G Pro 2. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy the LG G Pro 2, letting go a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.