Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2014-02-12 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Cyber shade |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nubia Red Magic 3S is a bit better than LG G Pro 2, with a 75.8 score against 74.8. Although the nubia Red Magic 3S is incredibly newer than the LG G Pro 2, it's somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier. These devices work with Android OS, but nubia Red Magic 3S has newer 9.0 Pie version and LG G Pro 2 has Android 5.0 version, offering some additional features.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit better CPU than LG G Pro 2, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with a greater number of faster cores and a greater amount of RAM memory. LG G Pro 2 features a bit more vivid screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, although it has a bit worse display pixel density, a little smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels.
Nubia Red Magic 3S shoots a lot better videos and photos than LG G Pro 2, because it has a much bigger back camera sensor, a back-facing camera with much more megapixels, a lot larger aperture to capture better low-light images and videos and a lot better 7680x4320 video definition. The nubia Red Magic 3S features much more memory for applications and games than LG G Pro 2, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a superior battery performance than LG G Pro 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3200mAh.
Although nubia Red Magic 3S is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG G Pro 2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG G Pro 2. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy the LG G Pro 2, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.