Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2014-02-12 | 2019-10-05 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Black, Blue, Green and Red |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 373 pixels per inch | 264 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A20s is just a bit better than LG G Pro 2, getting a 77 score against 74.8. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A20s has 11 version and LG G Pro 2 has Android 5.0, so it provides the user some nice extra features. Although Samsung Galaxy A20s is a bit heavier than LG G Pro 2, it's just a little bit thinner and also a lot newer.
LG G Pro 2 has a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because although it has an inferior number of cores and 1 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor. The LG G Pro 2 counts with a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better screen pixel density and a higher 1920 x 1080px resolution.
LG G Pro 2 features a bit better camera than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a lot smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures, and they both have the same resolution back-facing camera, the LG G Pro 2 also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a lot bigger camera sensor which offers a much better photo and video quality.
Galaxy A20s has a superior storage to install games and applications than LG G Pro 2, because it has 32 GB more internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A20s counts with longer battery performance than LG G Pro 2, because it has a 25 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.