Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android 10 |
| 2014-02-12 | 2020-06-29 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.61 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 373 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A21 has a global score of 76.1, which is just a bit better than the LG G Pro 2's overall score of 74.8. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A21 has the newer 10 version while LG G Pro 2 has Android 5.0 version, so it provides you a couple additional features and performance tweaks. Galaxy A21's construction is way newer and a little bit thinner, but heavier than the LG G Pro 2.
Samsung Galaxy A21's CPU is just as good as the LG G Pro 2 one, because although the Samsung Galaxy A21 has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, and they both have 3 GB of RAM, it also counts with a greater number of cores. LG G Pro 2 counts with a lot better display than Galaxy A21, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better display pixel density and a better resolution of 1920 x 1080px.
LG G Pro 2 has a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A21, because although it has a lower resolution camera in the back and a much smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low light images, and they both have a same size sensor, the LG G Pro 2 also counts with a way better (4K) video quality.
The Galaxy A21 counts with much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than LG G Pro 2, and although they both have the same 32 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A21 also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A21 features better battery duration than LG G Pro 2, because it has a 25% more battery capacity.
Galaxy A21 not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.