Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android 14 |
| 2014-02-12 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A25 5G is a bit better than the LG G Pro 2, having a 79.9 score against 74.8. Galaxy A25 5G's body has the same thickness than LG G Pro 2, but it's heavier. Both devices in this review use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A25 5G has the newer 14 version while LG G Pro 2 has Android 5.0, so it offers some nice extra features and a performance increase.
LG G Pro 2 counts with an extremely better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has an inferior number of cores and 3 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit. LG G Pro 2 and Samsung Galaxy A25 5G have quite similar displays, although the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also has a quite higher quantity of pixels per inch of screen, a little bit bigger display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2340 resolution.
The Galaxy A25 5G features a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than LG G Pro 2, because it has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy A25 5G has a much better battery lifetime than LG G Pro 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G shoots much clearer videos and photos than LG G Pro 2, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also has a lot bigger camera aperture to take better photos in poorly lited situations, a back facing camera with much more MP and a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.