Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android 10 |
| 2014-02-12 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A31 has an overall score of 81.3, which is just a bit better than the LG G Pro 2's global score of 74.8. Even though Galaxy A31 is notably newer than LG G Pro 2, it's just a little thicker and a little heavier. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A31 has newer 10 version and LG G Pro 2 has Android 5.0 version.
The LG G Pro 2 features just a bit better looking display than Galaxy A31, although it has a just a little worse screen pixels density, a little bit lower 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution and a little bit smaller screen. LG G Pro 2 counts with a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A31, because although it has less RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a graphics co-processor.
Galaxy A31 features a much better camera than LG G Pro 2, and although they both have the same video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A31 also has a larger aperture, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor providing a much better image quality and a back-facing camera with much more megapixels.
Samsung Galaxy A31 features a lot bigger memory to store more games and applications than LG G Pro 2, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 512 GB and 32 GB more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy A31 counts with a much longer battery life than LG G Pro 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.