Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | -- |
| 2014-02-12 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has an overall score of 83.8, which is better than the LG G Pro 2's 74.8 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy A50 is a notably newer device, and it is also just a little lighter and just a little bit thinner than LG G Pro 2. The LG G Pro 2 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A50, although it has a little lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, a little bit worse number of pixels per inch in the display and a little bit smaller display.
Galaxy A50 and LG G Pro 2 both count with really similar processing units, because although the Galaxy A50 has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with a larger number of cores and 1 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy A50 has a little bit better camera than LG G Pro 2, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Galaxy A50 also has a larger sensor, a way bigger aperture to capture better low light photos and videos and a way higher 25 MP resolution camera in the back.
Galaxy A50 has a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than LG G Pro 2, because it has an external memory slot that allows up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory. Galaxy A50 features superior battery performance than LG G Pro 2, because it has a 25 percent more battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.