Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2014-02-12 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50s has a general score of 86.6, which is much better than LG G Pro 2's global score of 74.8. The Samsung Galaxy A50s is a incredibly newer phone, and it is also just a little lighter and a bit thinner than the LG G Pro 2. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A50s has a more recent 10 version and LG G Pro 2 has Android 5.0.
The Galaxy A50s features just a little better performance than LG G Pro 2, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with a higher number of cores and more RAM memory. LG G Pro 2 counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A50s, although it has a little smaller screen, a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a just a little inferior number of pixels per inch of screen.
Galaxy A50s features a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG G Pro 2, because it has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 512 GB and 96 GB more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy A50s has a way better camera than LG G Pro 2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy A50s also has a bigger camera aperture, a way bigger back camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and photographs and a much more mega pixels camera.
The Galaxy A50s features improved battery lifetime than LG G Pro 2, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.