Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-02-12 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is better than LG G Pro 2, with a global score of 85.5 against 74.8. Samsung Galaxy A51's body weights the same than the LG G Pro 2, but it's just a little bit thinner. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A51 has 11 version and LG G Pro 2 has Android 5.0 version, so it provides you some extra features.
The Galaxy A51 features a CPU that's just as good as the LG G Pro 2 one, because although the Galaxy A51 has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with more RAM memory and a higher number of cores. LG G Pro 2 counts with a bit better looking display than Galaxy A51, although it has a quite lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, a bit less pixels per screen inch and a quite smaller screen.
The Galaxy A51 has a lot better camera than LG G Pro 2, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the Galaxy A51 also has a bigger aperture for better low light captures and video, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking much better quality photos and videos and a camera in the back with a lot better resolution.
The Galaxy A51 counts with a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than LG G Pro 2, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with longer battery life than LG G Pro 2, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
The Galaxy A51 costs a bit more than the LG G Pro 2, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.