Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-02-12 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Prism cube black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is a lot better than the LG G Pro 2, getting a 90.8 score against 74.8. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a newer 11 version and LG G Pro 2 has Android 5.0, providing the user a lot of extra features and some performance improvements. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G's construction is a lot newer, but just a little heavier and a little bit thicker than LG G Pro 2.
LG G Pro 2 features a slightly better looking display than Galaxy A51 5G, although it has a little bit inferior number of pixels per inch in the display, a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a quite smaller screen. The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a much greater storage capacity for apps and games than LG G Pro 2, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and 96 GB more internal storage.
The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a CPU that's just as good as the processing unit in LG G Pro 2, because although the Galaxy A51 5G has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a really longer battery life than LG G Pro 2, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3200mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a much better camera than LG G Pro 2, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has a much bigger back camera sensor shooting way higher quality photographs and videos, a larger aperture to capture better low-light photos and videos and a lot better resolution camera.
The Galaxy A51 5G costs more money than the LG G Pro 2, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.