Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | -- |
| 2014-02-12 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | -- |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 has a score of 90.7, which is a lot better than the LG G Pro 2's 74.8 score. The Galaxy A52 is a just a little bit heavier phone than the LG G Pro 2, but both of them have the same thickness. LG G Pro 2 has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A52, although it has a quite smaller display, a little worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a little bit less pixels per inch in the screen.
Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than LG G Pro 2, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A52 and LG G Pro 2 feature quite similar CPUs, because although the Galaxy A52 has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with 3 GB more RAM memory and a greater number of cores (but slower).
The Galaxy A52 counts with a very superior battery life than LG G Pro 2, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3200mAh. Samsung Galaxy A52 features a lot better camera than LG G Pro 2, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a lot bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photos and videos in poorly lited environments, a much bigger back camera sensor and a lot better resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.