Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2014-02-12 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is much better than LG G Pro 2, with a score of 91.3 against 74.8. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a newer 12 version and LG G Pro 2 has Android 5.0 version. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a a little heavier phone than LG G Pro 2, but they are 0.33inches thick.
The LG G Pro 2 features a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, although it has a quite worse display pixel density, a little bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a bit smaller screen. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G's CPU is very similar to the processing unit in LG G Pro 2, because although the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with more RAM and more CPU cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with much more memory capacity to store more apps and games than LG G Pro 2, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a way better battery performance than LG G Pro 2, because it has a 41 percent more battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G takes much better photos and videos than LG G Pro 2, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a lot larger camera sensor, a much more mega-pixels camera and a much larger aperture to capture better low-light photography.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.