Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android 11 |
| 2014-02-12 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52s has a general score of 91.1, which is way better than LG G Pro 2's 74.8 overall score. The Galaxy A52s is a a bit heavier phone than the LG G Pro 2, but both have the same thickness. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A52s has the newer 11 version while LG G Pro 2 has Android 5.0 version, counting with some nice extra features and performance tweaks.
The LG G Pro 2 has a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy A52s, although it has a quite smaller screen, a little bit worse pixels density and a bit worse 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution. Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a bit more powerful CPU than LG G Pro 2, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory and a larger number of faster cores.
The Galaxy A52s takes way better pictures and videos than LG G Pro 2, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A52s also has a back-facing camera with much more MP, a much bigger camera sensor providing a way better image quality and a much larger camera aperture to capture better low light images.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s features a superior memory capacity for apps and games than LG G Pro 2, because it has 128 GB internal memory and an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A52s features a much longer battery life than LG G Pro 2, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.